Is this the last paper on the 9/11 Pentagon attack?

Perhaps not, but it should be, at least regarding the question of plane impact! This paper has gathered every argument raised to dispute the official claim that AA77 hit the Pentagon. It shows that not one of these claims stands up to investigation. Just because the official reports of the events of 9/11 are full of lies and clever deceptions does not necessarily mean that everything they assert will be incorrect.

In this case the clever deception is to release only a small amount of information and to make sure that what they release is ambiguous or contradictory. Thus conflict develops among truth activists with obvious damaging effects on their credibility. How can we expect the public to pay attention to our claim that explosives were used in the demolition of the WTC buildings if we cannot agree about such a straightforward matter as the attack on the Pentagon?

It was David Ray Griffin who provided the trigger for this paper. He set out to assemble the evidence for and against the plane impact theory in Chapter 7 of his recent book “9/11 Ten Years Later“. It seemed to me that he had done so in a way which left the reader with the impression that it was likely that there was no plane impact. I had previously thought that the matter had been settled to the satisfaction of any scientist by the publication of papers co-authored with Warren Stutt and with David Chandler. Griffin is not a scientist but he has written many excellent books on the subject of 9/11 and is highly regarded and influential. I thought his book would prolong the debate to the detriment of the 9/11 truth movement and decided to set out the evidence that I had collected over the years of studying this incident. It is to be found at the Journal of 9/11 Studies, titled “The 9/11 Attack on the Pentagon: the Search for Consensus“. Comments are invited.

This entry was posted in Announcements, Papers. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Is this the last paper on the 9/11 Pentagon attack?

  1. anonymous says:

    A new book on 9/11 is out. Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing a book on what happened during 9/11.

    In a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that developers who wish to build skyscrapers in NYC must submit a satisfactory demolition plan to the building authorities before their projects are approved. The WTC had an approved demolition plan and on 9/11, this was put into action to demolish the complex.

    The WTC was constructed with built-in explosive charges for its eventual demolition – 3 thermo-nuclear devices were placed within the foundations of the complex for this purpose.

    Khalezov has tried to buy advertising space on popular websites but no-one will accept his business. He was told that the US government will not allow websites to mention this book!

  2. Frank Legge says:

    I am afraid that this is a false lead. Dimitri Khalezov is very damaging to the 9/11 truth movement as his bizarre theories do not hold up. His efforts mix rubbish with the good work done by activists and make it hard for the newcomer to find the reputable work. Here is a good study of Khalezov:
    http://www.takeourworldback.com/wtcnukeddisinfo.htm
    You will see that there are many reasons to reject his mini-nuke theories.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>